+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Hawking in 'God didn't do it' shocker!

  1. #16
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,417

    Re: Hawking in 'God didn't do it' shocker!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jules View Post
    But to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, it has to be testable.

    But M theory does make predictions (at least according to wiki) just that the observed consequences are in inaccessible dimensions. Making predictions is the requirement of a hypothesis, normally we can test these and move from hypothesis to theory. I am unsure what one calls a hypothesis that cannot presently be tested. For example evolution makes predictions about future adaptation that cannot be validated within any reasonable timeframe, all consistencies in the past might not be regarded as predictions - perhaps not hugely dis-similar to M theory really.

    So if Darwin was able to state that his 'prediction' was that all successful adaptations would be of reproductive benefit to the individual, is it possible for M theory to predict that all newely discovered interactions at quantum or cosmological levels shall be compatible with the mathematics of said theory!

  2. #17

    Re: Hawking in 'God didn't do it' shocker!

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Williams View Post
    Ideas such as string theory and the multiverse are not proper theories, in that they are not only not testable but there is no hard evidence for them. However, they are consistent with current mathematical understanding, which is far more than can be said for "heaven and hell and sweet baby Jesus".
    I don't think these theories are inherently untestable, it's just that we don't yet know exactly how to do it. The key event in the acceptance of general relativity was when Eddington showed that light is bent by the gravitational field of the sun. That didn't "prove" relativity, but along with some other predictions made it account more precisely for gravitational effects than Newton's less accurate law. That may well happen with M theory if it really is the bee's knees.

    It's good that Hawking has come to express adherence to a multiverse theory as many creationists were using his supposed single universe views to argue for a single creation. In reality cutting edge thought in cosmology has been moving towards multiverse ideas for quite a long time.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 22nd April 2008, 07:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •