Conclusion
In my opinion this study represents a larger trend that I have discussed before – clinical research going backwards in quality after higher quality studies yield negative results. We have seen this with acupuncture – after well-controlled trials were negative, some proponents decided that “pragmatic” (i.e. unblinded) studies were better. We see this with homeopathy, where well-controlled studies are negative and then dismissed because treatments were not individualized.
Now we are seeing the same pattern with intercessory prayer. The research is clearly negative, so now some proponents are turning to “proximal” intercessory prayer, which just happens to require unblinding.
In the final analysis it is all an elaborate excuse to dismiss high quality negative studies in favor of low quality studies that are more likely to yield false positive results.
Bookmarks