http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...001/7TOCPJ.SGMOriginally Posted by brianp
Peer reviewed isn't it?? ;-)
Nano thermite. How did that get in the dust?
What is "nano thermite"? How was it detected?
(remember we've met fuckwits like you before here, not usually obsessed with kiddy fidling like you are, but equally stupid, so you might just want to look back over previous discussions on the forum, realise we're all ten times smarter than you, and give up)
Bentham? Peer reviewed?
Don't believe the boast of the vanity press.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6664637.html
It's about as per-reviewed as the Sunday Sport, and almost as reliable.
http://cectic.com/184.html
the Empire State buiding had fire that burnt got many hours longer- it did not collapse.
In 1975 the North Tower had a fire from the 9th -14th floor, it did not collapse.
in 1991 Philadelphia a 38 storey building burnt for 19 hours over 8 floors, it did not collapse.
a 56 storey building in Venezuala burnt over 26 floors and did not collapse.
Im Madrid a 32 storey block burnt for 24 hours over 10 storeys.
The Twin towers and other collapsed after how long?
And why when the first 'plane' hit did the firemen find the lobby blown to pieces, nothing went down the shafts as they were sealed. Why, false flag. How come a so callled Hijackers passport survived intact when steel girders were turned to dust. Yes of course this is not a conspiracy.
Hello Valeria
Can you tell us a bit more about the point you are trying to make? In the "fires burnt for hours/days" examples, can you tell us how many of these were caused by direct hits by jet airliners?
As you are well aware non were hit by airliners, what does that have to do with anything, the fact is the towers collapsed and others did not.If the heat was so intense and had destroyed everything why did we see shots of people not far from the site(one or two floors down) waving from the remains of the windows, surely if the heat was sointense and melting thick supports they would have been frazzled to. And did the so called hijacker throw his passort out of the plane before it hit the tower,or is a passport capable of standing such a huge amount of heat. Seems like there are some discrepancies, dont you think. Your thoughts
Impeccable logic.
If trying to make a comparison, as long as you have some kind of similarity, any differences can obviously be safely ignored in the interests of trying to make a point.
As you're no doubt really keen on research, I suggest you start by researching what has already been covered in this thread, then after you've done that, do feel free to post if you think you're not wasting your time, and I'm sure people will feel free to judge from what you then post whether you have anything new to say, and also whether they think they'd be wasting their time trying to go over anything they've already discussed earlier.
Impeccable deflection, I had read the threads and have found some of you, are more than in love with your Thesaurus, composing paragraph upon paragraph, which really have meaning only to yourselves, and probaly make you swell with pleasure as you read back the inane drivel you have written. I actually got bored with a lot of it as im not interested in your point scoring or slating any one who has an opinion other than yours. I have noticed that if you cant answer a question then off you go........
Aircraft fuel cannot melt girders....fact.If your always wasting your time replying to the threads may I suggest you go elsewhere, then you wont be. And I can ask whatever question I damn well like.
Fact, the janitor of the first tower told how he heard an explosion from the basement of the tower seconds before the 'plane' hit or was that a 'plane' that went into the basement too??
Id be grateful if you could answer, if you cant be bothered then dont tell me why you cant be, thanks
What it has to do with is that maybe these towers collapsed because not only were there fires but also they were hit by airliners. That is probably why these towers collapsed and others did not.
Well, in that case, I guess you should just fuck off.
Is that simple enough language for you? I tried really, really hard and managed to get it down to words of one syllable.
Of course, someone who actually was interested in the subject might read the thread in the possibility that someone (CT or otherwise) might have hinted at some new angle, even if only accidentally.
Then again, someone who was just trolling, or coming here with the intention of saying nonsense, being aggressive and arrogant from the start, getting the bum's rush, and using that to reinforce their sad little prejudices wouldn't need to read the thread because they're not actually interested in the topic, or looking at anyone else's take on the subject, they're just interested in attempted points-scoring.
So it was the acually the plane that weakened the structure or the plane fuel fire that weakened the structure?
Is that what you believe caused the collapse. Thank you for your polite answer.
You're suggesting that a conspiracy let off explosions at the base of the tower before the aircraft hit, in areas that would have people nearby who'd be highly likely to survive, when those supposed explosions had no obvious practical need to happen at that time, and could very easily have been set off *during* the plane impact, in the immediate aftermath, or at some later time when the building had been evacuated of potential witnesses?
Looks like one more action that needs a Grand Conspiracy, which has no understanding of planning, somehow manages one mistake after another, involves huge numbers of people yet somehow magically manages to stay secret.
So telling someone to F off who has just joined this forum is not agressive,? You really are a very self unaware person, just read what you have written?
Obviously I slightly deflated your over large ego a little, so lets try again.
Why am I writing nonsense, please give details.
I am interested in the topic but not monologues of abuse and ridicule of another person.
I do not know what a bums rush is,Presumably an American slang word , please explain.
I am unaware of what trolling is, please explain.
I am not intereted in point scoring, that is more your cup of tea.
I actually dont think you can use words of one syllable, otherwise your thread would read i. o. u a. Hmm .Look forward to your reply. BTW (Thats by the way) I am not arrogant, just have two parents who raised me correctly.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks