+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: "Skewed views of science"

  1. #1
    Hero member bindeweede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hertfordshire.
    Posts
    3,205

    "Skewed views of science"

    Another interesting little video from "Doug".



    He has made 15 videos and the ones I've seen so far have been good.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/QualiaSoup

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    east neuk
    Posts
    54

    Re: "Skewed views of science"

    Excellent :)
    Can we make this compulsory viewing?

  3. #3
    Hero member bindeweede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hertfordshire.
    Posts
    3,205

    Re: "Skewed views of science"

    I was wondering where the word "Qualia" comes from. I came across this...

    Neurological syndromes in which consciousness seems to malfunction, such as temporal lobe
    epilepsy, visual scotomas, Charles Bonnet syndrome, and synesthesia offer valuable clues
    about the normal functions of consciousness and ‘qualia’. An investigation into these syn-
    dromes reveals, we argue, that qualia are different from other brain states in that they possess
    three functional characteristics, which we state in the form of ‘three laws of qualia’ based on a
    loose analogy with Newton’s three laws of classical mechanics. First, they are irrevocable: I
    cannot simply decide to start seeing the sunset as green, or feel pain as if it were an itch; sec-
    ond, qualia do not always produce the same behaviour: given a set of qualia, we can choose
    from a potentially infinite set of possible behaviours to execute; and third, qualia endure in
    short-term memory, as opposed to non-conscious brain states involved in the on-line guidance
    of behaviour in real time. We suggest that qualia have evolved these and other attributes (e.g.
    they are ‘filled in’) because of their role in facilitating non-automatic, decision-based action.
    We also suggest that the apparent epistemic barrier to knowing what qualia another person is
    experiencing can be overcome simply by using a ‘bridge’ of neurons; and we offer a hypothe-
    sis about the relation between qualia and one’s sense of self



    http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache...&ct=clnk&gl=uk

    It is beyond me, but I am reading one of V.S. Ramachandran's books atm - "Phantoms in the brain". It is aimed at the layman, and I am so, so "lay".

    But I am trying, ......... no doubt in more ways than one.

  4. #4

    Re: "Skewed views of science"

    "Qualia" has always seemed to me to be a word made up by philosophers on the principle that "if you can't explain something, give it a fancy name and pretend that settles the matter". I think it basically means what the rest of us mean by "consciousness", which we don't understand either, so the existence of the word "qualia" doesn't seem to achieve anything at all.

  5. #5
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Midden
    Posts
    973

    Re: "Skewed views of science"

    If you're a man of iron, here is a starting-point for the study of qualia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia

    Mind you, I suspect that the vast literature on this subject would have been pretty slender if the philosophers, before taking up their pens, had had to say what problem the notion of qualia is supposed to solve.

  6. #6
    Hero member bindeweede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hertfordshire.
    Posts
    3,205

    Re: "Skewed views of science"

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Muck oGentry View Post
    If you're a man of iron, here is a starting-point for the study of qualia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia

    Mind you, I suspect that the vast literature on this subject would have been pretty slender if the philosophers, before taking up their pens, had had to say what problem the notion of qualia is supposed to solve.
    Lord Muck, thank you for the link. I think.

    Seven paragraphs on defining it, followed by,
    Since it is by definition difficult or impossible to convey qualia verbally, it is difficult to demonstrate them directly in an argument;
    I don't think I'll be digging any deeper.

    I just wondered why "Doug" used the word in the first place.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Synthetic life form accuses God of "playing science"
    By Matt in forum Fun and humour.
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th May 2010, 09:29 AM
  2. "Science ponders 'zombie attack' "
    By Croydon Bob in forum Fun and humour.
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18th August 2009, 10:35 PM
  3. 5 Atrocious "Pseudo-Science" Cliches to Throw into a Black Hole
    By SorryImPsychic in forum Science and Skepticism
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 21st July 2009, 08:14 PM
  4. "Legal complaint" about "How to spot a hidden religious agenda"
    By edd in forum Politics, Society Economics & Law
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 19th March 2009, 09:35 PM
  5. "Whole Science" Website
    By dalriada in forum Science and Skepticism
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 13th June 2008, 07:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •