Four children and a 45-year-old fifth suspect face charges of writing blasphemous material in the latrines of a mosque.
I understand that under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code, blasphemy in Pakistan is punishable by death or life imprisonment.
http://www.sindhtoday.net/pakistan/59289.htm
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009%5C02%5C04%5Cstory_4-2-2009_pg7_15
The principal of the Superior Science Academy – where the children studied – said he had asked the children to pray in the mosque, but told them to leave the academy after he saw the blasphemous writing. Asked how he knew they were guilty, he said: “Muslims cannot do such things” so it must be the Ahmadi children
So being a muslim totally prevents vandalism?
Ah religion, it is amazing how it still induces idiocy upon the masses.
Don't they have a reputation for vadalision 'idols'?
It wasn't so long ago (1536) that William Tyndale translated the Bible into English and was slowly tortured to death for about 3 days and then burned at the stake for his "blasphemies." But that was before the separation of Church and State. What a difference a little objectivity can make.
But when did the separation occur?
And how did the the King actually making himself head of the English Church mean that a "trend" towards separation began?
Do you really have any idea what you are writing about?
What, when the Anglican Church was set up as the established Church of England which is still headed by the monarch?Originally Posted by Antipositor
Edit: sorry, JofK, realize it's what you said yourself but I'm baffled about this separation ...
Last edited by DrS; 14th June 2009 at 09:52 PM.
I'm baffled that you're unfamiliar with this basic tenet of modern liberal democracies.
I'll post the link again: The separation of church and state.
Ban 'im Jonno!
![]()
Bookmarks