+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

  1. #1
    the truth is out there
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,448

    Shouldn't that be 6000 years?


  2. #2
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,417

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    It's very simple, god is playing games with us - it's a test of our faith. All archeologists are going to hell.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Brackley
    Posts
    230

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pebble View Post
    All archeologists are going to hell.
    Where they'll spend all eternity telling Tony Robinson he can't jump down into the trench?

  4. #4

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    Jeremy Hardy on the News Quiz:

    "6000 years? We tell jokes that are older than that..."

  5. #5
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bradford
    Posts
    623

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    “In the beginning, God created heaven and earth, which beginning of time, according to this chronology, occurred at the beginning of the night which preceded the 23rd of October in the year 710 of the Julian period.” In the right margin of the page, Ussher computes the date in “Christian” time as 4004 B.C.
    It is important to be precise in our errors - 6012 years.

  6. #6
    Superhero Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Garden of Eden
    Posts
    2,184
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim the Mage View Post
    It is important to be precise in our errors - 6012 years.
    6011 - there was no year 0.

  7. #7
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South East London
    Posts
    958

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    The rock doesn't even exist yet, as a member of the Church of Next Tuesday, the universe and the rest of us come into existance on 14 October 2008.

    I think one problem I foresee of our church is we will need to change our name each week.
    Church of next Tuesday
    Church of Today (14th October only)
    Church of yesterday (15 October)
    Church of Last Tuesday (16th 0 23rd)
    Church of 2 Tuesdays ago.

    I will nave to remember not to order to much stationary at any 1 time.

  8. #8
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bradford
    Posts
    623

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    Quote Originally Posted by polomint38 View Post
    The rock doesn't even exist yet, as a member of the Church of Next Tuesday, the universe and the rest of us come into existance on 14 October 2008.

    I think one problem I foresee of our church is we will need to change our name each week.
    Church of next Tuesday
    Church of Today (14th October only)
    Church of yesterday (15 October)
    Church of Last Tuesday (16th 0 23rd)
    Church of 2 Tuesdays ago.

    I will nave to remember not to order to much stationary at any 1 time.
    Not at all since the revelation is that creation will take place next Tuesday. Deniers of that will burn in hell/should be burnt as heathens/subjected to the test of fire/sacrificed to appease the spirit of Monday night.

    True believers accept that one day next Tuesday will arrive and we will float from the earth transfixed by the true revelation of Tuesday's truth.

    You sir are a heretic and must die!!!

  9. #9
    Appreciative guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,544
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    Well it's Tuesday and I see you're correct, the earth does indeed exist today.

    Back on topic. Life 4.28 Billion years ago? That'd be something suprising if it can be verified.

  10. #10
    Superhero Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Garden of Eden
    Posts
    2,184
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Shouldn't that be 6000 years?

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt View Post
    Life 4.28 Billion years ago? That'd be something suprising if it can be verified.
    Hindu creationists have already "proved" it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Cremo

    I saw a Cremo talk many years ago and he had an extraordinarily confused idea of evolution happening but excluding humans. So four billion years ago we were here eating... ?

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Tinnitus, 21 years old, scared, help...
    By Jfisch177 in forum General Health topics.
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 31st December 2009, 03:14 PM
  2. 12 Years On And They Are Still Cashing In
    By brianp in forum Conspiracy theories, NWO, Illuminati.
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 26th September 2009, 03:23 PM
  3. 19 Things That It Took Me 50 Years To Learn
    By bindeweede in forum Fun and humour.
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 29th December 2008, 01:34 PM
  4. Crystal skull 3600 years old.
    By bindeweede in forum Scams and Hoaxes
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22nd May 2008, 07:44 PM
  5. Our World in 50 000 years?
    By Allo Allo in forum Science and Skepticism
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26th August 2007, 11:35 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •