+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Freedom and whisky gang thegither?

  1. #1
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Midden
    Posts
    973

    Freedom and whisky gang thegither?

    This fairly made me choke on my herring and oatmeal:

    http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_ne...790006,00.html

    Glasgow City Council wants to ban serving drink in glasses. Because we all know how much damage can be done by a drunken bampot with a glass in his hand...So people who want to have a glass of whisky will have to have a plastic cup instead.

    John 11[empty intensifier]35, as we say up here.





  2. #2
    Lark's vomit
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Midway between London and Oxford
    Posts
    564

    Re: Freedom and whisky gang thegither?

    I saw a trick done by a friends Scottish grandfather in which he slowly warmed an emptied whisky glass (single malt of course) in his hands for 10 minutes, after which he managed to get a few fluid oz. more! :D

    Will plastic cups be just as good? My God there could be uproar!

  3. #3
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Midden
    Posts
    973

    Re: Freedom and whisky gang thegither?

    A few fluid oz. more?

    Alert JREF! The million is in danger!

  4. #4
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Banbury, Oxfordshire
    Posts
    872

    Re: Freedom and whisky gang thegither?

    Glaswegians have been glassing each other for centuries - it's a traditional sport (I speak as a Glaswegian myself, BTW)

    What next - are they going to ban metal cutlery in restaurants? You can take someone's eye out with a fork, you know ... :D

  5. #5
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Midden
    Posts
    973

    Re: Freedom and whisky gang thegither?

    Perhaps the report didn't do justice to the councillor's position, but it comes across as pretty average nonsense:

    But Councillor Gordon Macdiarmid, the board's convener, said he was not worried by the legal challenge, adding: 'It is astonishing that anyone in the 21st century should seek to place the protection of glass receptacles ahead of the safety of their patrons.'

    Macdiarmid, who has campaigned for years to make Glasgow the first 'glass-free' city in the world, said he was acting on evidence, as well as demands from parents of 'glassing' victims, surgeons and the police.





    Odd. I'd have thought we were talking about protecting not glass receptacles but the right to drink from them.

    And what sort of evidence, one wonders, could establish the policy principle he favours. He probably means that he thinks it right to agree to these demands rather than refuse them. But his words don't explain why he thinks that safety trumps humdrum freedom.

    Bah! If this goes on, I shall end my days penning foamflecked letters to the Herald, signed " Disgusted, Partick X" >:(

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Independance, freedom and choice.
    By Floppit in forum General Discussion and off-topic.
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 17th October 2009, 03:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •