Her email is there, but not her last name.
How are her statements defamatory? What has she said about you that is untrue?
Why do you need to give her full name to exercise your 'right' of reply?
Where is the light and love? You lot pronounce it, but rarely practice it.
Did someone say bottom-feeder? Got that right.
Are your tax returns in order Nina? Will your advertising and 'services' stand up to scrutiny under the changes to the Trading Standards laws coming into force in April?
Her full name is in her blog which is linked in her profile.
Fair comment, but I think a 'I received your emails" would have sufficed from Nina, I'm presuming she thought she was being clever.
I bet Gary Mannion is cursing the day Nina 'stuck up for him', it must do his credibility wonders with supporters such as her.... with friends like that, who needs enemies...
Hmmm bindeweede, I'm sure she wouldn't do that....would she? Sadly think I'm going to be left to make of her silence what I will, and what I make of it is not altogether positive. Still, I live in hope.
Her 2 email's Hayley sent to me which I have kept are defamatory.
Yes my tax returns are dealt with by my Accountant.
And yes I have been in touch with Trading Standards to get their views, which Julia will know, she was asked to remove the lady at the Trading Standards name from the skeptic site.
No I have nothing to fear about the law if it is passed in April.
Show me where I advertise to give Counselling or call myself a Counsellor.
Thanks for (kind of) answering, Nina. Why did you list counselling 'qualifications' unless you wished to give the impression that you have the skills to counsel people?
Sadly, I can't see the information I asked for in your post, but your defensive response has certainly made me think about things.
Lastly, are you aware that genuine qualified counsellors are specifically advised against advertising their qualifications in such a manner in the BACP Code of Ethics?
Nina is not a qualified counsellor, in case anyone was wondering, as she herself (sort of) states above. In order to truthfully refer to yourself as such, you must undergo a series of accredited courses, ending in a Diploma. It is my guess that the highest of her 'modules' may equate to the 10 week taster course often taken by those wishing to familiarise themselves with basic concepts.
Edit: that's one evening (3 hours) a week for 10 weeks, by the way. Or 30 hours.
Last edited by fallible; 3rd January 2008 at 10:59 PM.
You never learn do you Nina? Just had another look at your site. Are you STILL not aware of the Cancer Act 1939? Posting a 'testimonial' is the same as advertising what you can do:
Remove it, or be reported.I was diagnosed with secondary bone cancer of the breast bone and upper spine following a bone scan early 2005. The scan showed spots of bone cancer, the sternum showed a deeper/solid block.
I was recommended to see Nina by a colleague of my husband working in Staverton. I had my first appointment in October 2006, following several treatments I had a further bone scan in January 07. The bone scan showed that the sternum had less density of the cancer.
It is my opinion that Nina's healing helped achieve this result, I feel everytime I have had a treatment it has made my condition, less painful and much easier to live with. G TOMKINSON, LYNEHAM, WILTSHIRE
There are other issues here that you obviously are not aware of as it is a local matter, the case is being dealt with by the local police, I will be passing on the information I now have thanks to your site. I cannot make any more comment's, I have been advised not to do so.
In case you are wondering it has nothing to do with my Healing.
Fallible,Nina is not a qualified counsellor, in case anyone was wondering, as she herself (sort of) states above. In order to truthfully refer to yourself as such, you must undergo a series of accredited courses, ending in a Diploma. It is my guess that the highest of her 'modules' may equate to the 10 week taster course often taken by those wishing to familiarise themselves with basic concepts.
Edit: that's one evening (3 hours) a week for 10 weeks, by the way. Or 30 hours.
Thanks for your post. I fear she is just another con-artist, deceiving the gullible and credulous. Just like our Gary. I nearly did one of those taster courses. I didn't, but I could always claim I did and fake a certificate.
The woman is vile.
Bookmarks