+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: What is the argument

  1. #1
    Sock Puppet
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Virgo Supercluster
    Posts
    906

    What is the argument

    Here is so called evidence that the solar system is not as old as science estimates.
    http://www.icr.org/article/3477/

    Io has erupted it's mass 40 times?
    If true, it proves nothing. They ignore the concept of rock recycling. Magma spewed onto the surface gets covered by subsequent eruptions and eventually returns to the depths. Like a pump in a pond powering a fountain, constantly reusing the same water. There is no reason the process can't last 4.5 billion years.

    Creationists have to ignore so much!

    Maybe I'm missing the point. Is there a reasonable argument in that article?

  2. #2

    Re: What is the argument

    Ah, the old "Science can't explain every little detail of something, therefore creationism wins" argument. When it comes down to it, we don't understand volcanoes on Earth, so how would we be able to explain ones millions of miles away with only a few photos to study?

    You are entirely correct about the recycling. Io completly resurfaces itself every million years or so. I'm just surprised it's only 40 times its mass and not more.

  3. #3
    Pontificator-in-Chief Admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,352
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: What is the argument

    It's the ubiquitous Argument to Ignorance fallacy.

    "We can't explain this, therefore our beliefs are more likely to be right". It's used extensively by people who hold 'weird' beliefs.

    BTW, I doubt that scientists would accept the argument that Io's volcanic activity is not understood as implied in that article. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_%28m...#Tidal_Heating
    .

  4. #4

    Re: What is the argument

    When all the Io observations are explained by science, what will creationists say then? Move on to the next gap in our knowledge? Why aren't they still defending the idea that the Earth is at the centre of the universe?

  5. #5
    Appreciative guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,544
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: What is the argument

    In such God of the gaps arguments I'd like to ask believers if they know my father's name. If not why don't they bow down before me. Something that they don't know must be God's work right? So if they don't know my father's name I must be the son of God?

    No I don't know why Io behaves as it does. Such avenues for exploration and discovery are exciting. Who knows what applications this new knowledge might have when we figure it out? I feel sorry for the creationists who are denied such excitement already "knowing" that the answer to all of lifes mysteries is that "God did it"

  6. #6
    Sock Puppet
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Virgo Supercluster
    Posts
    906

    Re: What is the argument

    Thanks for the replies.

    It seems too easy to find holes in this one.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. World's saddest internet argument techniques
    By Croydon Bob in forum Fun and humour.
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17th January 2010, 07:50 PM
  2. The argument for ignorance
    By Dr B in forum Critical thinking and logic.
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 25th February 2007, 02:08 PM
  3. What counts as an argument?
    By Dr B in forum Critical thinking and logic.
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 13th January 2007, 08:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •