See: http://ufocasebook.com/bestufopictures.html
These are the best UFO photos. What they all have in common is that they are never quite clear enough to be unambiguous.
Surely, especially with the proliferation of high-quality modern equipment, someone would manage to get a good picture!
.
...and how come we haven't seen an exponential increase in UFO photographs along with digital photography? With everyone and his brother having video phones, one would expect to see a wildly accelerated increase in photographic evidence of close encounters of the first kind. But there is no such leap.
Surely if people like Whitley Streiber are going round getting themselves abducted every ten minutes (or at least people who enter into Recovered Memory Therapy), surely someone would have taken their camera-phone onto the mother ship...
hmm these are the best photos?
at least one of them is a well known example of internal refelection
the washinton capitol building photo has a series of light flying above the capitol. They are actually just reflections of a set of lights on the building.
http://www.ufocasebook.com/washingtondc1952.jpg
what is interesting is that It looks like that photo has been cropped so that you can't see that light sources that form the reflections. So not only is this nonsense, it's deliberately mis-leading nonsense.
After 10 minutes googling I can't find a link to the article that explained the photo. I seem to remember it was an article about common mistakes in UFO photos. If anyone can remember the source I would be grateful.
Welcome to the forum Huw.
There were some shown on Randi's Swift commentary a few years back - examples of how mistakes were taken as UFOs.
It's not an area that I'm up on, although the answers often look obvious once someone experienced has explained the photo.
.
Interesting that they're all pretty much the same shape
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks