See: http://www.britishfertilitysociety.o...upuncture.html
The way to iron out these false positives and negatives is to consider all (or as many as possible) trials that have been done to a high standard and look to see whether there really is an overall positive effect or if the few positive trials are just 'noise in the data'.
This is important because proponents of things such as acupuncture will normally focus on the positive trials that have been done and use these as evidence that acupuncture treatments work. So, as an example, if there have been 100 trials done and 5 of them have been positive, proponents will select these 5 positive trial results and ignore the others. The significance of this becomes clear when we remember that we would expect 5 positive trials out of 100 (5%) purely by chance.
Here is the abstract of the research that was carried out:
Acupuncture and herbal medicine in IVF: a review of the evidence for clinical practice. British Fertility Society, Policy and Practice Guidelines
Ying Cheong1, Luciano G Nardo2,3, Tony Rutherford4, William Ledger5
1Division of Developmental Origins of Adult Diseases (DOHaD), Level F, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK; 2Department of Reproductive Medicine, St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK; 3North West Fertility, IVF Unit, UK; 4Reproductive Medicine Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK; and 5Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine,University of Sheffield, UK.
The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the effectiveness of (a) acupuncture and (b) Chinese herbal medicine on the treatment of male and female subfertility by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). All reports from RCTs of acupuncture and/or Chinese herbal medicine in ART were obtained via searches through The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Sub-fertility Group’s Specialised Register of controlled trials, and other major databases. The outcome measures were determined prior to starting the search, and comprised: live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancy, miscarriage rate and adverse effects arising from treatment. Overall, 14 trials (a total of 2670 subjects) were included in the metaanalysis. The results provided no evidence of benefit in the use of acupuncture during assisted conception. Further studies should attempt to explore the potential placebo, as well as treatment, effects of this complimentary therapy. Essential elements for a quality RCT will be the size of the trial, the use of a standardised acupuncture method and of placebo needles.
Ying Cheong1, Luciano G Nardo2,3, Tony Rutherford4, William Ledger5
1Division of Developmental Origins of Adult Diseases (DOHaD), Level F, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK; 2Department of Reproductive Medicine, St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, UK; 3North West Fertility, IVF Unit, UK; 4Reproductive Medicine Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK; and 5Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine,University of Sheffield, UK.
The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the effectiveness of (a) acupuncture and (b) Chinese herbal medicine on the treatment of male and female subfertility by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). All reports from RCTs of acupuncture and/or Chinese herbal medicine in ART were obtained via searches through The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Sub-fertility Group’s Specialised Register of controlled trials, and other major databases. The outcome measures were determined prior to starting the search, and comprised: live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancy, miscarriage rate and adverse effects arising from treatment. Overall, 14 trials (a total of 2670 subjects) were included in the metaanalysis. The results provided no evidence of benefit in the use of acupuncture during assisted conception. Further studies should attempt to explore the potential placebo, as well as treatment, effects of this complimentary therapy. Essential elements for a quality RCT will be the size of the trial, the use of a standardised acupuncture method and of placebo needles.
If the NHS are funding these 'complementary' treatments, then they are simply wasting taxpayers' money. Money that could be better spent - perhaps on research into fertility treatments!
.


Menu
Categories