Uri Geller on Greek TV in 2004

[JonDonnis]

In 2004 Uri Geller appeared on Greek TV, he displayed a range of his usual "psychic" abilities which the Greek audience lapped up.


Click Here To Watch (http://badpsychics.com/thefraudfiles/modules/news/article.php?storyid=164)

[ghosthunterbebunker]

In 2004 Uri Geller appeared on Greek TV, he displayed a range of his usual "psychic" abilities which the Greek audience lapped up.


Click Here To Watch (http://badpsychics.com/thefraudfiles/modules/news/article.php?storyid=164)


Jon so nice to see you here! Tell me do you still have mediums running your forum!

[JonDonnis]

No, i finally saw sense and got rid of them.
Now there is myself, two sceptics and one fence sitter.
But no mediums!

[Remote_Viewer]

Geller is the real deal
kindly tell me why you guys keep debunking him when he
has proven himself in the lab under scientific protocols ?

watch all links closely and before you even think
about commenting or offering lame excuses to explain
his successes at SRI away you better have done your
homework before replying.

http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote_viewing_history_sri2.html

RV

[Cuddles]

Geller is the real deal
kindly tell me why you guys keep debunking him when he
has proven himself in the lab under scientific protocols ?

watch all links closely and before you even think
about commenting or offering lame excuses to explain
his successes at SRI away you better have done your
homework before replying.

http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote_viewing_history_sri2.html

RV

So, how exactly would it be possible to debunk him if he had genuine powers?

de·bunk(d-bngk)
tr.v. de·bunked, de·bunk·ing, de·bunks
To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims of: debunk a supposed miracle drug.

I would suggest it is you who needs to do some homework.

[Mongrel]

I would suggest it is you who needs to do some homework.

Here's a good place to start R_V http://www.randi.org/uri/index.html

P.S. Here's some spare punctuation I had laying around, you obviously need it more than I do ;)

.................................................. .................
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
;;;;;
:::::

[John Jackson]

Geller is the real deal.....

Well the SRI experiments were shown to be extremely sloppy and the names of Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ will always be used as examples of how not to investigate psychics.

If you intend taking remote viewing seriously (and it can be tested scientifically) I would suggest that you distance yourself from Geller and the SRI experiments. Both have been thoroughly discredited and no-one takes them seriously today.

Skeptics are always willing to look at new evidence - but it has to be credible evidence.