View Full Version : "Legal complaint" about "How to spot a hidden religious agenda"
edd
17th March 2009, 03:06 PM
A recent NewScientist story "How to spot a hidden religious agenda" has been pulled as a result of a legal complaint:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126975.800-how-to-spot-a-hidden-religious-agenda.html
http://www.wikileaks.com/wiki/Censored_New_Scientist_article:_How_to_spot_a_hidd en_religious_agenda%2C_28_Feb_2009
skbuncks
17th March 2009, 03:36 PM
I wonder who exactly the legal complaint is from. I cant see anything which particulalry stands out as being libelous
The article seems somewhat reminiscent of this thread (http://www.ukskeptics.com/forum/showthread.php?p=57015#post57015)
skb
Croydon Bob
17th March 2009, 04:14 PM
I wonder who exactly the legal complaint is from. I cant see anything which particulalry stands out as being libelous Yes, I've just re-read it, it all seems quite tame. The only person it can be is 'James Le Fanu' who has written for the Telegraph, New Statesman, etc, and doesn't label himself as a creationist or religious extremist. He is however, at the very least, an idiot who writes utter rubbish (http://www.jameslefanu.com/articles/evolution-hairy-attempt-to-teach-evolution). His book: 'Why Us?: How Science Rediscovered the Mystery of Ourselves' is quoted from in the article and hasn't been published in the UK yet.
ZERO
18th March 2009, 12:05 PM
From the wikileaks site:
UK libel law can bankrupt publishers with legal fees even if the case never reaches a conclusion.
Sometimes I wish the law was about justice.
Trinoc
18th March 2009, 12:22 PM
Yes, I've just re-read it, it all seems quite tame. The only person it can be is 'James Le Fanu' who has written for the Telegraph, New Statesman, etc, and doesn't label himself as a creationist or religious extremist. He is however, at the very least, an idiot who writes utter rubbish (http://www.jameslefanu.com/articles/evolution-hairy-attempt-to-teach-evolution). His book: 'Why Us?: How Science Rediscovered the Mystery of Ourselves' is quoted from in the article and hasn't been published in the UK yet.
If that's so, then why is the linked "Why Us" review still available?
I suspect the "Expelled!" crowd myself.
ZERO
19th March 2009, 10:35 PM
Wikileaks...banned in Australia!
http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/australia-issues-wikileaks-linking-fine-warning-585894
:-[ >:-)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.