<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UK-Skeptics articles and commentary &#187; star sign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukskeptics.com/cms/tag/star-sign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukskeptics.com/cms</link>
	<description>UK-Skeptics articles and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:41:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Astrology and Precession</title>
		<link>http://www.ukskeptics.com/cms/astrology-and-precession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukskeptics.com/cms/astrology-and-precession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star sign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukskeptics.com/cms/?p=657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





vbloke © 2006
Let&#8217;s assume for a minute that astrology actually    works. No questions, it just does. Now, when the astrological signs were drawn up originally, it was done around    600BC. Each sign (e.g.: Scorpio) are exactly 30° wide &#8211; they are measured    eastward along the ecliptic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Easy AdSense V2.82 -->
<!-- Post[count: 3] -->
<div class="ezAdsense adsense adsense-leadin" style="text-align:center;margin:12px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5227179739731971";
/* 468x60, created 30/05/09 */
google_ad_slot = "0591718367";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><hr />
<p class="author">vbloke © 2006</p>
<hr style="margin-bottom: 16px;" /><span class="drop_cap">L</span>et&#8217;s assume for a minute that astrology actually    works. No questions, it just does. Now, when the astrological signs were drawn up originally, it was done around    600BC. Each sign (e.g.: Scorpio) are exactly 30° wide &#8211; they are measured    eastward along the ecliptic from the vernal equinox, which is the intersection    of the elliptic and the celestial equator and is the zero point.<br class="l" /><br class="l" />When the system was originally set up, the zero point was in Aries and was called    the &#8220;first point of Aries&#8221;.<span id="more-657"></span><br class="l" /><br class="l" />Aries encompassed the first 30° of the ecliptic, next came Taurus (30°    to 60°), Gemini (60° to 90°) and so on&#8230;</p>
<p>This scheme ignored the actual stars themselves, but uniformity was more important    than fussing about star positions.</p>
<p>Since then, precession has caused the celestial equator to wobble so as to    cause the intersection point between it and the ecliptic to move westward along    the ecliptic by 36° or a tenth of the way around.</p>
<p>Your birth sign ignores the effect of precession. What a horoscope calls &#8220;Aries&#8221; is the 30° segment along the ecliptic that is east of the current location of the vernal equinox &#8211; but today, most of it is in Pisces. The next 30° segment (called Taurus in the horoscope) is mostly in Aries. The astrological signs are directions in space that no longer correspond to the constellations that bear their names.</p>
<p>Precession causes the position of the sun on the vernal equinox to move as    the earth wobbles on its axis &#8211; then again, the position of the sun varies on    every date (analemma). This means that it is not only the names of the zodiac    signs that are now wrong, the names of the tropics are also inaccurate!</p>
<p>This all dates to when the sun is within the constellation of your birth sign.    According to astrology (corrected for precession &#8211; although these dates will    vary slightly from year to year), you may find that you&#8217;re actually a different    birth sign.</p>
<p>If you were born between November 30th and December 17th, you&#8217;re actually an    Ophiuchus.</p>
<p>What happens in astrology is that the sun travels through the traditional 12    signs of the zodiac over the course of the year. Whatever sign the sun is in    when you&#8217;re born is the sign you &#8220;are&#8221;. However, over the past 2,600    years (since the charts were drawn up), the precession of the earth has shifted    the ecliptic westwards and now the sun visits the constellation of Ophiuchus    during November/December. I very much doubt you&#8217;ll find a horoscope that takes    this into account.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Capricorn</strong>: January 20th to February 16th<br />
<strong>Aquarius</strong>: February 17th to March 11th<br />
<strong>Pisces</strong>: March 12th to April 18th<br />
<strong>Aries</strong>: April 19th to May 13th<br />
<strong>Taurus</strong>: May 14th to June 21st<br />
<strong>Gemini</strong>: June 22nd to July 20th<br />
<strong>Cancer</strong>: July 21st to August 10th<br />
<strong>Leo</strong>: August 11th to September 16th<br />
<strong>Virgo</strong>: September 17th to October 30th<br />
<strong>Libra</strong>: October 31st to November 23rd<br />
<strong>Scorpio</strong>: November 24th to November 29th<br />
<strong>Ophiuchus</strong>: November 30th to December 17th<br />
<strong>Sagittarius</strong>: December 18th to January 19th</p></blockquote>
<p>Since I&#8217;m no longer Cancer and am now Gemini &#8220;all of a sudden&#8221;, does    this mean I&#8217;ll have to change my character and I can sue astrologers for giving    me wrong information?<br />
<br class="l" /><br class="l" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukskeptics.com/cms/astrology-and-precession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
