Selfridges have decided to employ self-professed psychics, the so-called Psychic Sisters, in their Oxford Street store. Despite the fact that this has led to much criticism, and that they are almost certainly operating in breach of the Fraudulent Mediums Act (1951), Selfridges have decided to ignore all concerns regarding the ethics or morality, as well as the legality, of providing this 'service' and have decided to continue with it regardless.
UK skeptic 'Mark' went for a reading on 17th April 2006. The reading was a Tarot reading given by Psychic Sister Sarah Jayne who specialises in: "Tarot & Clairvoyant, Psychometry & Mediumship".
There is a full transcript of the reading here: http://www.skeptics.org.uk/documents/selfridges_psychic_reading.pdf (PDF 91Kb). Comments (in blue) are added by Mark, the rest is the transcript of the tape recording of the reading.
NOTE: Mark is a skeptic and is aware of how Cold Reading works and how much psychics rely on the feedback they get from their clients in such readings. Mark did not offer any false feedback (a sure way of ascertaining whether the psychic is responding to feedback) nor did he use blocking techniques (such as refusing to answer questions), he provided honest feedback albeit without the embellishment that many non-skeptics unwittingly provide.
A summary of the reading.
It is quite obvious right from the start that this reading is anything but accurate. Here is a summary of some of the things that the 'psychic' came up with:
Psychic readings are normally done to a formula; Tarot cards and other such props are simply used to break the reading up into sections where the 'psychic' can concentrate on different tried and tested routines which focus mainly on: love; relationships; money; career; health; travel; and ambitions.
When done correctly, psychic readings (a form of Cold Reading) can be quite convincing. What we've seen here, however, is a very poor attempt at a reading. If anyone can find anything in that reading that even resembles anything approaching true psychic ability, please contact us and let us know what it is: Contact us.
Selfridges' responsibilities.
Remember that Selfridges are not only endorsing this 'psychic service' they
are actually employing the Psychic Sisters in their Oxford Street store.
Their defence so far has been that this service is 'for entertainment purposes'.
Nowhere in Selfridges' store or at anytime during Mark's reading was any sign
or mention of this being an entertainment service.
There is no disclaimer shown anywhere or given at any time that informs the
customer that this is an entertainment service.
The payment for this 'service' is not made to the psychics, the payment goes through Selfridges' tills. The Selfridges receipt clearly states "If you are not entirely satisfied with your purchase" you can get a refund within 28 days (discretionary). As this 'psychic service' is purchased through their tills and this is printed on the receipt then the money-back guarantee should also apply to this psychic service.
Mark emailed Selfridges and asked for a refund due to the fact that his psychic reading was clearly nothing of the kind; the part of the reading referring to his father being particularly offensive. As no mention of this being an entertainment service was made anywhere at any time, Selfridges should undoubtedly give a refund due to the lack of quality of their service.
Mark's email to Selfridges went unanswered by them (customer service?) so Mark went into the store on Saturday 22nd April 2006 and demanded a refund stating the fact that the reading was wholly inaccurate and the part where they mentioned his father was also hurtful.
Before issuing a refund, the staff member consulted the Psychic Sisters to see if the refund would be OK. She did this stating that the Psychic Sisters were not part of Selfridges and therefore not part of their refund policy. This is an odd claim to make considering that the payment for the 'service' went through Selfridges' tills. See the receipt here: Selfridges' receipt.
Selfridges refund policy is a discretionary one. If they think an unreasonable request is being made for a refund they would surely defend themselves. In this case, they clearly would have been foolish to try to defend their 'service' as being a quality one when it was abysmal.
Perhaps Selfridges were taken in by the Psychic Sisters' claim on their website:
All of our readers are of the highest quality and their reputations are unbeatable within their own specialist fields.
If the reading Mark was given was of the highest quality, it doesn't say much for those psychics who are less gifted than Sarah Jayne!
The more this issue develops the more it becomes clear that Selfridges' use of self-professed psychics is nothing more than a money-making scheme. They clearly cannot guarantee the quality of this 'service' and when challenged on the issue, they have been forced to give a refund.